| Peer-Reviewed

Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia

Received: 20 October 2021    Accepted: 12 November 2021    Published: 19 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Genotype x environment interaction was evaluated under six environments during 2017 to 2019 cropping season in the highlands of bale, Southeastern Ethiopia for grain yield of fifteen promising lentil genotypes promoted from the previous trials. Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications was used. The ANOVA revealed significant variation of grain yield for genotypes, environments, and genotypes by environment interaction. The explained percentage of grain yield by the environment, genotype, and genotype-environment interaction was 47.64, 25.47, and 26.89 respectively. In Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis, the first two Principal components revealed more than 73% of the variability for the yield which indicates that G and GE together accounted for more than 25 percent of the total variability. The results finally indicated that AMMI stability value, GSI, and AMMI biplot are informative methods to explore stability and their by in subsequent variety recommendations. Based on AMMI Stability Value (ASV), G13, G5, G12, G1, and G15 showed the least ASV and were found to be more stable whereas G10, G7 G9 G8, and G14 have the second lower ASV and showed moderate stability. Based on Genotypes Selection Index (GSI), G5, G13, and G15 showed the lowest GSI whereas G10, G1, G4, G11, and G15 showed the second-lowest GSI. However, G4 and G10 gave grain yield higher than the checks, with moderate stability. Therefore, these two genotypes were identified as candidate genotypes to be verified for possible releases for the highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia, and similar agro-ecologies.

Published in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12
Page(s) 74-79
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

AMMI, Genotypes by Environment Interaction, GSI, Lentil, Stability

References
[1] Abebe S., and Esayas T. (2020). Genotype x environment interaction and yield stability analysis of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) genotypes. Int. J. Adv. Res. Biol. Sci. (2020). 7 (1): 14-26.
[2] Cornelius, P. L., Crossa, J., Seyedsadr, M. S., & Kang, M. (1996). Statistical tests and estimators for multiplicative models for cultivar trials. In M. Kang & J. Gaich (Eds.), Genotype-by-environment interaction (pp. 199–234). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[3] Crossa J (1990). Statistical analyses of multi-location trials. Adv. Agron. 1990; 44: 55-85.
[4] Darai R, Sarker A, Sah RP, Pokhrel K and Chaudhary R. (2017). AMMI Biplot Analysis for Genotype X Environment Interaction on Yield Trait of High Fe content Lentil Genotypes in Terai and Mid-Hill Environment of Nepal. Ann Agric Crop Sci. 2017; 2 (1): 1026.
[5] Dehghani H, Ebadi A, Yousefi A (2006). Biplot analysis of genotype by environment interaction for barley yield in Iran. Agron J.; 98: 388-393.
[6] Dehghani H., Sabaghpour SH., and Sabaghnia N. (2008). Genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of some lentil genotypes and relationship among univariate stability statistics. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research: 6 (3), 385-394.
[7] Ebdon J, Gauch H. Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: I. Interpretation of genotype X Environment Interaction. Crop Sci. 2002; 42: 489-496.
[8] FAO, 2006. Data stat year 2006. Food Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
[9] Flores, F., Moreno, M. T., & Cubero, J. I. (1998). A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G×E interaction. Field Crops Research, 56, 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 4290(97)00095-6
[10] Gauch, H. (2006). Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46, 1488–1500. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193
[11] Gauch HG, Zobel RW, Kang MS & Gauch HG. (1996). AMMI analysis of yield trials. Genotype by-environment interaction, pp: 85-122. Gujarat Agric Uni Res J.; 22: 101-102.
[12] Jones M. J., Singh M., 2000. Long-term yield patterns in barley-based cropping systems in northern Syria. 2. The role of feed legumes. J Agric Sci 135, 237-249.
[13] Kempton RA. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 1984; 103: 123-135.
[14] Khazaei, H., Subedi, M., Nickerson, M., Martínez-Villaluenga, C., Frias, J., & Vandenberg, A. (2019). Seed protein of lentils: Current status, progress, and food applications. Foods, 8 (9).
[15] Khaldun A., Banik B., Mondal A. (2012). Genotype-by-environment Interaction Assessment Using Additive Main Effects and the Multiplicative Interaction Model (AMMI) in Maize. Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume 8, No. 1 pp 22-32.
[16] Muniyandi S., Kadanamari S., Shabir H., Amit K., and Sher A. (2019). Identification of stable lentil (Lens culinaris Medik) genotypes through GGE biplotand AMMI analysis for North Hill Zone of India. Legume Research, 42 (4) 2019: 467-472.
[17] Naser Sabaghnia, Hamid Dehghani, and Sayyed Hossain Sabaghpour (2008). Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Lentil Yield in Iran. Agronomy Journal Volume 100, Issue 3. pp 760-764.
[18] Purchase, J. L., Hatting, H., & van Deventer, C. S. (2000). Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 17, 101–107.
[19] Sabaghpour, S. H., M. Safi khni, A. Sarker, A. Ghaff ri, and H. Ketata. 2004. Present status and future prospects of lentil cultivation in Iran. p. 23. In AED (ed.) 5th European Conf. on Grain Legumes, Dijon, France. 7–11 June. AEP Publ., Paris, France.
[20] Sarker A., Erskine W., Singh M., 2003. Regression models for lentil seed and straw yields in Near East. Agr Forest Meteorol 116, 61-72.
[21] Subedi M., Khazaei H., Arganosa G., Etukudo E., and Vandenberg A. (2020). Genetic stability and genotype × environment interaction analysis for seed protein content and protein yield of lentil. Crop Science. 2020; 61: 342–356.
[22] Yan, W. (2001). GGEbiplot: A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two way data. Agronomy Journal, 93, 1111–1118.
[23] Yan, W., & Hunt, L. (2010). Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield. In J. Jules (Ed.), Plant breeding reviews (Vol. 16, pp. 135– 178). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
[24] Zobel, R., Wright, M., & Gauch, H. (1988). Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388–398.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tadele Tadesse, Amanuel Tekalign, Belay Asmare. (2021). Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(4), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tadele Tadesse; Amanuel Tekalign; Belay Asmare. Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021, 6(4), 74-79. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tadele Tadesse, Amanuel Tekalign, Belay Asmare. Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia. Chem Biomol Eng. 2021;6(4):74-79. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12,
      author = {Tadele Tadesse and Amanuel Tekalign and Belay Asmare},
      title = {Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia},
      journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering},
      volume = {6},
      number = {4},
      pages = {74-79},
      doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20210604.12},
      abstract = {Genotype x environment interaction was evaluated under six environments during 2017 to 2019 cropping season in the highlands of bale, Southeastern Ethiopia for grain yield of fifteen promising lentil genotypes promoted from the previous trials. Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications was used. The ANOVA revealed significant variation of grain yield for genotypes, environments, and genotypes by environment interaction. The explained percentage of grain yield by the environment, genotype, and genotype-environment interaction was 47.64, 25.47, and 26.89 respectively. In Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis, the first two Principal components revealed more than 73% of the variability for the yield which indicates that G and GE together accounted for more than 25 percent of the total variability. The results finally indicated that AMMI stability value, GSI, and AMMI biplot are informative methods to explore stability and their by in subsequent variety recommendations. Based on AMMI Stability Value (ASV), G13, G5, G12, G1, and G15 showed the least ASV and were found to be more stable whereas G10, G7 G9 G8, and G14 have the second lower ASV and showed moderate stability. Based on Genotypes Selection Index (GSI), G5, G13, and G15 showed the lowest GSI whereas G10, G1, G4, G11, and G15 showed the second-lowest GSI. However, G4 and G10 gave grain yield higher than the checks, with moderate stability. Therefore, these two genotypes were identified as candidate genotypes to be verified for possible releases for the highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia, and similar agro-ecologies.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Identification of Stable Lentil Genotypes Using AMMI Analysis for the Highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia
    AU  - Tadele Tadesse
    AU  - Amanuel Tekalign
    AU  - Belay Asmare
    Y1  - 2021/11/19
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12
    T2  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
    JF  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
    JO  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
    SP  - 74
    EP  - 79
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8884
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.12
    AB  - Genotype x environment interaction was evaluated under six environments during 2017 to 2019 cropping season in the highlands of bale, Southeastern Ethiopia for grain yield of fifteen promising lentil genotypes promoted from the previous trials. Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications was used. The ANOVA revealed significant variation of grain yield for genotypes, environments, and genotypes by environment interaction. The explained percentage of grain yield by the environment, genotype, and genotype-environment interaction was 47.64, 25.47, and 26.89 respectively. In Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) analysis, the first two Principal components revealed more than 73% of the variability for the yield which indicates that G and GE together accounted for more than 25 percent of the total variability. The results finally indicated that AMMI stability value, GSI, and AMMI biplot are informative methods to explore stability and their by in subsequent variety recommendations. Based on AMMI Stability Value (ASV), G13, G5, G12, G1, and G15 showed the least ASV and were found to be more stable whereas G10, G7 G9 G8, and G14 have the second lower ASV and showed moderate stability. Based on Genotypes Selection Index (GSI), G5, G13, and G15 showed the lowest GSI whereas G10, G1, G4, G11, and G15 showed the second-lowest GSI. However, G4 and G10 gave grain yield higher than the checks, with moderate stability. Therefore, these two genotypes were identified as candidate genotypes to be verified for possible releases for the highlands of Bale, Southeastern Ethiopia, and similar agro-ecologies.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Oromia Agriculture Research Institute, Sinana Agriculture Research Center, Bale-Robe, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agriculture Research Institute, Sinana Agriculture Research Center, Bale-Robe, Ethiopia

  • Oromia Agriculture Research Institute, Sinana Agriculture Research Center, Bale-Robe, Ethiopia

  • Sections